The “Reading Wars” have been around for decades – the debate about how best to teach kids to read. If you’re not quite sure what all the current fuss is about, essentially the two sides are: 1) those who say we should focus on foundational reading skills (we’ll call them the Science of Reading or SOR folks) and 2) those who subscribe to the whole language or balanced literacy approach. Unfortunately, some take the “you’re either with us or against us” stance which doesn’t do teachers any favors.
Balanced literacy is about understanding the meaning of what you’re reading right from the start. Balanced literacy folks are not opposed to phonics teaching, but sounding out written words is considered only one way to recognize words. Students can also use pictures and other clues to guess at what the word is or what the sentence means.
On the flip side, the SOR folks emphasize teaching the basics, like phonics and decoding. But they also believe that kids should hear stories read aloud, especially ones they can’t read on their own yet, to get rich language exposure. It’s not all about decoding; it’s about building comprehension and important literacy skills such as fluency, vocabulary, and oral language.
SOR, which might simply be called research on reading, refers to studies conducted and published over several decades in the U.S. and around the world in multiple languages. These studies conclude, among other findings, that phonics is essential for becoming a skilled reader. Even those students with robust vocabularies and background knowledge need to be taught how to read the words on the page.
Sure, some people on both sides seem to act like they’re worlds apart when it comes to teaching reading. But let’s take a step back, as Jim Cummins reminds us, “There is a huge amount of agreement when we get away from the political dimensions of how to teach reading effectively….Everybody agrees that students need phonemic awareness, they need to have a strong foundational basis in understanding sound symbol relationships, phonics.” (2022).
Amanda Goodwin, who worked with both camps while co-editing a series on literacy for Reading Research Quarterly, summed it up well: “Overall, I’d say that the experts agreed … not to insist that there’s a single, ‘one best’ way to teach reading” (Heller, 2022).
Teachers often get caught between policies, personal preferences, and extreme philosophies. Both sides have their points. Phonics is crucial; no doubt about that. But reading isn’t just cracking the code; it’s also about making sense of what you read. It’s like putting together a jigsaw puzzle. You need both pieces—the code (letters and sounds) and the meaning (what it all adds up to). An excellent resource for teachers – and parents, administrators, and policymakers — called 10 Maxims, illustrates that integration of these processes is the key. The focus of our attention should be on finding common ground as we move forward and continue working on deepening and expanding our knowledge literacy issues.
Let’s face it, teachers are swamped. Who has time to dive into all that literacy research? In a nutshell, teaching phonics is essential but it shouldn’t be the first and only skill to be taught. It should be part of a language-rich program with read alouds, discussions, vocabulary development and the like. Some specific points for teachers to keep in mind include:
- Decoding is essential but other context clues can help students confirm the meaning of the words students sound out.
- Although phonics isn’t the only aspect of reading that makes a skilled reader, it is the bedrock of reading and literacy more generally.
- Detailed discussions of segments of text help students develop vocabulary and better understand the full text.
- Predictions related to a text’s meaning help students engage in and comprehend what they read, particularly when the teacher revisits predictions and confirms or refutes them based on evidence in the text.
- Explicitly teaching key vocabulary prior to reading and pointing out the words when they are encountered in the text help build vocabulary and comprehension.
- Reading a variety of texts is important: fiction, poetry, nonfiction (e.g., biographies) and informational from social studies and science.
- The practice of integrating discussion with reading and writing is beneficial for skill building. Talk about the text (predictions), read about it, talk about what was read, write about it (e.g., a summary, a graphic organizer, or an opinion piece), then talk about what was written.
For multilingual learners, they also need to learn decoding and foundational skills. Teachers need to provide English oral language instruction so that students understand the words being used to teach foundational skills. Teachers should also provide kids with plenty of chances to use the language with their peers. For example, explicitly teach vocabulary terms or a language form, then have students practice using the language with peers. Since students are learning these new skills and information in a new language, teachers also need to make adjustments to instruction and provide scaffolds to help multilingual learners make sense of what they are reading and hearing. Link here for an excellent discussion of reading and multilingual learners.
In the end, regardless of your personal philosophy or mandate of your school, all kids need both decoding skills and rich language experiences. Explicit skill building activities are important for becoming fully literate, but alone they won’t achieve the important goal that we all share – to make every student a confident, skilled reader and writer. That’s the real win.
Heller, R. (2022). Taking stock of the science of reading: A conversation with Amanda Goodwin. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(8), 32-36.
A version of this blog appeared in Education Week on September 12, 2023.